storiesbas.blogg.se - Visual prolog mac os x

Nguyen, About unnecessary performance differences between Prolog implementations, Proceedings of the Colloquium on Implementation of Constraint and Logic Programming Systems (CICLOPS 2001)

^ a b C/Java interface can also be used for graphics and OS control.

^ Jan Wielemaker and Vıtor Santos Costa: Portability of Prolog programs: theory and case-studies.

Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages. 'On the Portability of Prolog Applications'.

Benchmarking results: OpenRuleBench yearly open-source benchmark of rule engines.

Benchmarking results: Survey of java prolog engines by Michael Zeising.

Benchmarking results: B-Prolog, SICStus, XSB, SICStus vs Yap vs hProlog.Benchmarking software: older, Dobry, Aquarius benchmark suite, (Bothe, 1990), (Demoen et al.

Benchmarking issues: Odd Prolog benchmarking, Performance differences.Operating system and Web-related features Web-related ISO-Prolog, plus event-handling, CLP(FD), and tablingĮxtended Prolog, Multi-dialect, including ISOĮdinburgh Prolog, with interfaces to Poplog Common Lisp and Pop-11Įdinburgh, ISO-Prolog, Quintus and SICStus Prolog compatible Fortunately, there are only few cases where we find predicates with the same name but different semantics (e.g. Currently, the way predicates are spread over the libraries and system built-ins differs enormously.